Connecticut 2026 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05145

Introduced
2/11/26  
Refer
2/11/26  
Report Pass
3/24/26  
Refer
4/2/26  
Report Pass
4/9/26  
Refer
4/14/26  
Report Pass
4/17/26  
Engrossed
5/4/26  
Report Pass
5/4/26  
Passed
5/6/26  
Chaptered
5/20/26  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Public Hearing Requirement For Certain Water Companies Requesting To Cease Operations Or Discontinue The Provision Of Water Service.

Impact

The proposed changes significantly affect state laws concerning water supply management. By enforcing public hearings for water companies intending to shut down services, the bill aims to safeguard the interests of consumers and preserve access to potable water. This action reflects a broader commitment to ensure public utilities are operated in compliance with regulatory standards and that services remain uninterrupted unless a clear determination is made regarding the company's viability.

Summary

House Bill 5145 addresses the operational protocols for water companies seeking to cease operations or discontinue water services. The bill mandates that any water company must obtain consent from the Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (PURA) and the Department of Public Health before ceasing service. This stipulation ensures that water companies maintain accountability and fulfill their responsibilities in providing adequate water supply and services to customers.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 5145 appears to be largely supportive among consumer advocacy groups who view the bill as a necessary measure for protecting public interests, particularly in light of increasing concerns regarding water quality and availability. However, some stakeholders in the water industry may express reservations about the additional regulatory burdens imposed by the need for public hearings, viewing it as a potential obstacle to their operational flexibility.

Contention

Notably, points of contention surrounding the bill could arise from industry representatives who argue that state oversight may hinder efficient management decisions. There is also the concern about how economic viability is assessed and the criteria that will be used by regulatory bodies. Balancing regulatory scrutiny with the operational needs of water companies is expected to be a key area of debate both during and after the legislative process.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT HB07086

An Act Requiring The Public Utilities Regulatory Authority To Open A Docket Concerning The Combined Public Benefits Charge.

CT SB00648

An Act Requiring The Public Utilities Regulatory Authority To Issue Annual Reports Concerning Transmission Projects.

CT SB01531

An Act Concerning Public Utility Transparency And Accountability And Proceedings Of The Public Utilities Regulatory Authority.

CT HB05929

An Act Requiring The Public Utilities Regulatory Authority To Make More Frequent Rate Adjustments.

CT HB05959

An Act Requiring The Public Utilities Regulatory Authority To Regulate Residential Internet Service.

CT HB07243

An Act Concerning Requirements For Appointments Of Utility Commissioners To The Public Utilities Regulatory Authority And Substantial Conflicts Of Interest Of Such Utility Commissioners.

CT HB07088

An Act Requiring The Public Utilities Regulatory Authority To Study Alternative Energy Delivery Methods, Develop A Capital Investment Funding Mechanism And Increase The Frequency Of Rate Adjustment Proceedings.

CT SB01193

An Act Concerning The Composition Of The Public Utilities Regulatory Authority.

CT HB05143

An Act Requiring The Appointment Of The Attorney General And Consumer Counsel To The Public Utilities Regulatory Authority.

CT HB05953

An Act Prohibiting Members Of The Public Utilities Regulatory Authority From Employment With Utility Companies For A Period Of Fifteen Years.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.