Arizona 2026 Regular Session

Arizona House Bill HB2692

Introduced
1/22/26  
Report Pass
2/18/26  
Report Pass
2/23/26  

Caption

procurement; professionals; construction services

Impact

This legislation would significantly impact how public agencies procure construction services, offering more streamlined processes and increased options for project delivery. Notably, the bill states that procurement for horizontal construction must conclude by December 31, 2030, pushing agencies to adapt to these regulations swiftly. It also emphasizes the submission of qualifications from contractors based on criteria beyond just pricing, aiming to elevate the quality of construction services and promote fairness in selection processes.

Summary

House Bill 2692 is designed to amend various sections of the Arizona Revised Statutes related to public buildings, specifically focusing on the procurement processes for construction services. The bill aims to modernize the procurement methods available to public agencies by allowing the use of job-order contracting and delineating clearer requirements for construction-manager-at-risk and design-build procurement methods. This is intended to enhance flexibility and efficiency in how public construction projects are managed, potentially reducing bureaucratic delays and improving cost control.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding HB 2692 appears generally positive among supporters, who view these changes as necessary advancements that will facilitate better infrastructure development and execution of public projects. However, there are concerns expressed by some stakeholders regarding the potential for reduced oversight and the adequacy of contractor qualifications, which may arise from the expedited procurement processes outlined in the bill.

Contention

Key points of contention in discussions surrounding HB 2692 involve the implications of the proposed procurement methods for contractor accountability. Critics may argue that a shift towards job-order contracting and less stringent procurement processes could allow for subpar workmanship or lack of competitive pricing, ultimately impacting the quality of public infrastructure. The requirement that certain construction contracts must be negotiated with selected contractors raises questions about the balance between efficiency and maintaining rigorous standards in public construction.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

AZ HB2875

Health professionals; unprofessional conduct

AZ HB2625

Competitive sealed bidding; questions; answers

AZ HB2223

Wind farms; construction; policies; procedures

AZ SB1150

Wind farms; construction; policies; procedures

AZ SB1145

Special districts; construction; payments

AZ HB2599

Condominiums; construction defects; actions

AZ SB1258

Procurement; director; technical correction

AZ SB1743

2025-2026; human services

AZ SB1089

ADOT; report; construction projects; bidders

AZ SB1671

Traditional healing services; AHCCCS

Similar Bills

MO SB1452

Establishes provisions relating to construction contracts

MO SB615

Establishes provisions relating to construction contracts

MO HB3166

Establishes rules to govern contracts between contractors, subcontractors, and other parties to construction contracts

MO HB1915

Establishes rules to govern contracts between contractors, subcontractors, and other parties to construction contracts

LA HB856

Provides relative to Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity Construction Phase Contract (EN SEE FISC NOTE SG EX)

CA SB983

San Diego Unified Port District: job order contracting: pilot program.

CA AB778

Local Agency Public Construction Act: internet website posting.

CA SB598

Public contracts: local water infrastructure projects: Construction Manager/General Contractor project delivery method.