AZ
Arizona Senate Bill SCR1020
Arizona 2025 Regular Session
Menu
AZ

Arizona 2025 Regular Session

Arizona Senate Bill SCR1020

Caption

Ballot measures; judges; odd-numbered years

Impact

If passed, SCR1020 would modify existing legislation regarding the election and retention of judges, potentially leading to changes in how judicial vacancies are filled. Under the new provisions, judges would serve for regular terms of four years and would be subjected to voter retention decisions during the specified odd-numbered year elections. Moreover, this bill may alter how resources are allocated during election cycles by synchronizing judicial elections with other state and local elections, which could increase voter turnout and participation in judicial elections.

Summary

SCR1020 proposes an amendment to the Arizona Constitution aiming to adjust the election process for judges and the associated ballot measures. One of its key provisions includes the requirement that judges of the superior court in counties with populations under 250,000 will be elected during general elections held in odd-numbered years. This seeks to streamline the election process and ensure judicial positions are filled in a timely and efficient manner. Additionally, it reforms several sections pertaining to the powers of citizens to initiate legislation and call referendums, enhancing their involvement in the electoral process.

Contention

The proposed changes have stirred some contention among lawmakers and advocacy groups. Supporters argue that aligning judicial elections with other major elections could lead to greater awareness and engagement among voters regarding judicial candidates. Critics, however, express concern that this shift may undermine the appointment process and affect the independence of the judiciary by tying judicial elections too closely to partisan electoral cycles. Furthermore, the amendment could complicate the existing initiative and referendum processes by modifying the requirements for citizen-initiated measures, which some see as a reduction in direct democratic power.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NJ SCR43

Proposes constitutional amendment authorizing Legislature to invalidate certain court decisions.

CA SB699

Legislature: constitutional course.

TX SJR54

Applying to the Congress of the United States to call a convention under Article V of the United States Constitution for the limited purpose of proposing one or more amendments to the constitution to impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, to limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and to limit the terms of office of federal officials and members of Congress.

TX HJR98

Applying to the Congress of the United States to call a convention under Article V of the United States Constitution for the limited purpose of proposing one or more amendments to the constitution to impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, to limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and to limit the terms of office of federal officials and members of Congress.

HI SB1225

Proposing An Amendment To Article Xvii, Section 3 Of The Hawaii Constitution To Specify That The Standard For Voter Approval Of A Constitutional Amendment Proposed By The Legislature Is A Majority Of All The Votes Tallied Upon The Question.

HI SB1225

Proposing An Amendment To Article Xvii, Section 3 Of The Hawaii Constitution To Specify That The Standard For Voter Approval Of A Constitutional Amendment Proposed By The Legislature Is A Majority Of All The Votes Tallied Upon The Question.

HI SB2315

Proposing An Amendment To Article Xvii, Section 3 Of The Hawaii State Constitution To Specify That The Standard For Voter Approval Of A Constitutional Amendment Proposed By The Legislature Is A Majority Of All The Votes Tallied Upon The Question.

HI SB2265

Proposing Amendments To The Hawaii State Constitution To Enable Legislation By The People.