Arkansas 2025 Regular Session

Arkansas House Bill HB1614

Introduced
2/27/25  
Refer
2/27/25  
Report Pass
3/5/25  
Engrossed
3/6/25  
Refer
3/6/25  
Report Pass
3/11/25  
Refer
3/13/25  

Caption

To Amend The Law Concerning Designations Related To Certain Criminal Justice Grant Programs.

Impact

One significant impact of HB1614 is the establishment of a Grant Advisory Board which is designed to provide guidance and support to subgrantees seeking to access grant funds. The board will not only offer reviews and advice on grant processes but also hear grievances from beneficiaries, showcasing a commitment to transparency and accountability in the management of these funds. Furthermore, the bill mandates that the designated state agency cannot disburse any grant funds without first consulting with this board, which marks an essential step towards improving oversight in the use of federal funds allocated for victim services.

Summary

House Bill 1614 seeks to amend the laws concerning designations related to certain criminal justice grant programs in Arkansas. The primary focus of the bill is to give the Governor the authority to designate the state agency responsible for administering and disbursing funds received under various federal acts, including the Victims of Crime Act of 1984 and the Violence Against Women Act of 1994. This shift aims to streamline the allocation of funds intended to support victim services across the state, thus ensuring a more effective utilization of resources aimed at combatting crime and assisting victims.

Contention

Despite its intent to enhance support for crime victims, the bill could face contention surrounding the governance and operational autonomy of the state agency designated to oversee these funds. Critics may argue that the additional layer of the Grant Advisory Board could complicate the disbursement process, potentially slowing down the delivery of critical services to victims. Moreover, there may be concerns regarding the financial interests of board members, particularly if they have ties to organizations seeking funding. This aspect necessitates careful vigilance to ensure that decisions made by the board are free from conflicts of interest and truly serve the needs of victims.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

TX SB2075

Relating to the establishment, powers and duties, terms, and governance of certain advisory bodies for programs administered by the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation.

CA AB52

Farmer equity: advisory committees.

CA AB2486

Medi-Cal: Whole Child Model program.

TX SB2312

Relating to the establishment and powers and duties of the Texas Advisory Committee on Geopolitical Conflict.

TX SB2900

Relating to certain advisory entities and work groups under the jurisdiction of the comptroller of public accounts or on which the comptroller's office is represented and to the repeal or redesignation of certain of those entities.

HI HCR179

Urging The aha Moku Advisory Committee To Follow Its Adopted Rules Of Practice, Fulfill Its Statutory Duties, Establish Policies To Assure Consistent Standards Of Administrative And Managerial Accountability; And Convening A Working Group To Make Recommendations.

HI HR169

Urging The aha Moku Advisory Committee To Follow Its Adopted Rules Of Practice, Fulfill Its Statutory Duties, Including Complying With The Sunshine Law, Conduct A Performance Review Of Its Executive Director, And Establish Policies To Assure Consistent Standards Of Administrative And Managerial Accountability; And Requesting The Office Of The Auditor To Conduct A Comprehensive Performance And Financial Audit Of The aha Moku Advisory Committee.